I already chose and submitted Bob Marley for my character. The paper MUST be ab

I already chose and submitted Bob Marley for my character. The paper MUST be about BOB MARLEY.
Love this choice! Personally, I think it might be more fitting to look at Bob Marley from a Phenomenological perspective because it focuses on how people feel alive, which seems appropriate given the influence of his music. But you can absolutely choose a cognitive approach (you would need to select a specific one) instead, if you decide it would be more interesting. Just let me know what you officially decide! (Comment from my professor)
_______________________________________________________
Description in Syllabus
You will write a 5–7-page scholarly paper, worth 60 points, examining a historical figure or fictional character (e.g. created in film, television, theatre) from the perspective of a personality theory of your choice. The paper must include description of the general concepts of the theory and background information about the character in sufficient detail to support your application of the theory. It must be written in APA format and will require you to find at least two professional references outside of your textbook.
Further Clarification
If you choose a fictional character as the subject of your paper, they cannot be a fantasy character (e.g. wizard, werewolf, superhero, cartoon character, etc.). Your chosen personality theory must be one we have discussed (or are scheduled to discuss) in class.
The paper will include three parts: detailed background information on the character, descriptive summary of the personality theory you have selected, and appropriate application of the personality theory to the character. Please also be sure to provide an introduction and conclusion, in which your opinions/reflections are encouraged. Factors to consider in your application section might include conflicts, developmental experiences, motivation, effects of learning, relationship influences, etc. If you have question as to whether you have picked a workable subject or if are applying a theory effectively, please ask. I am happy to give feedback before your due date if it is requested in a reasonable amount of time.
You are expected to maintain academic integrity and complete your own work. This expectation extends to the inappropriate use of AI technology, such as ChatGPT. Your work will be sent through a plagiarism checker, turnitin, when you submit to Canvas. Evidence of plagiarism will influence your grade and could result in a referral to the Dean of Arts and Sciences for disciplinary action.
Please use APA Publications Manual (7th ed.) style guidelines, double space, with 12-point fonts and one-inch margins. This should include proper use of in-text citations and an accompanying reference page. A link to the Purdue Owl, an online resource for using APA Style, is available on Canvas.
The required 5-7 pages must be obtained without counting your title or reference page. You must use at least two professional references (excluding our textbook) for your theory. Professional references include primary sources (e.g. journal articles) and secondary sources (e.g. textbooks). Non-professional and internet resources should still be listed in your reference section, but they may only be used to obtain information about the character you are using, not the theory from which you are analyzing.
Character Analysis Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
Introduction and Conclusion
view longer description
6 to >5 pts
Full Marks
Introduction orients reader to the focus and organization of the paper, and conclusion provides clarifying summary. Writer includes themselves in some way (e.g. explaining why they chose this character and theory, providing their take-aways of the utility of the theory after applying it, etc). Both sections grab the readers attention.
5 to >4 pts
Well done
Introduction orients reader to the focus and organization of the paper, and conclusion provides clarifying summary. Writer includes themselves in some way (e.g. explaining why they chose this character and theory, providing their take-aways of the utility of the theory after applying it, etc). One section fails to grab the readers attention but still meets its essential function.
4 to >3 pts
Acceptable
Introduction orients reader to the focus and organization of the paper, and conclusion provides clarifying summary. Writer attempts to include themselves in some way (e.g. explaining why they chose this character and theory, providing their take-aways of the utility of the theory after applying it, etc), although it might not fit well into the flow of the paper. Neither section is particularly attention-grabbing, but they meet their essential functions.
3 to >2 pts
Needs work
Introduction fails to fully orient reader to the focus and organization of the paper, and/or conclusion provides abrupt summary. Writer does not attempt to include themselves in some way. Neither section is particularly attention-grabbing.
2 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Introduction fails to fully orient reader to the focus and organization of the paper, and conclusion provides abrupt summary; OR one or both sections is missing. Writer does not attempt to include themselves in some way. Neither section is particularly attention-grabbing.
/ 6 pts
Character description
view longer description
12 to >11 pts
Full Marks
Character depiction includes relevant background information and description of the the character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors over time. Reader is able to get a good sense of the character’s internal experiences and how they engage with their environment. Adequate detail is provided to apply theory later in the paper. At least one source is cited.
11 to >9 pts
Well done
Character depiction includes relevant background information and description of the the character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors over time. Reader is mostly able to get sense of the character’s internal experiences and how they engage with their environment, although some elements could be unclear. Adequate detail is provided to apply theory later in the paper. At least one source is cited.
9 to >7 pts
Acceptable
Description of character includes some relevant background information and some description of the the character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors over time. Level of detail might not be enough to provide robust application of theory later in the paper, but the information provided is helpful in creating some understanding. At least one source is cited.
7 to >6 pts
Needs work
Description of character includes some relevant background information and/or some description of the the character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors over time. Level of detail is not enough to provide robust application of theory later in the paper, and/or the information provided is not clearly relevant. Source of information on character is not cited.
6 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Description of character is lacking in relevant background information and description of the the character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors over time. Level of detail is not enough to provide robust application of theory later in the paper. Source of information on character is not cited.
/ 12 pts
Theory Summary
view longer description
12 to >11 pts
Full marks
Description of theory is thorough, includes key concepts, and expresses writer’s understanding of the theory. All aspects of theory that will later be used in application to the character are included. At least two professional sources outside of the textbook are cited.
11 to >9 pts
Well done
Description of theory is thorough, includes key concepts, and expresses writer’s understanding of the theory, with some potential omissions or errors in comprehension. All aspects of theory that will later be used in application to the character are included. At least two professional sources outside of the textbook are cited.
9 to >7 pts
Acceptable
Description of theory is mostly thorough, includes most key concepts, and expresses writer’s general understanding of the theory, with some notable omissions and/or errors in comprehension. All aspects of theory that will later be used in application to the character are included. At least two professional sources outside of the textbook are cited.
7 to >5 pts
Needs work
Description of theory is mostly thorough, includes most key concepts, and expresses writer’s general understanding of the theory, with some notable omissions and/or errors in comprehension. Some aspects of theory later used in application to the character are excluded. At least one professional sources outside of the textbook are cited.
5 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Description of theory is lacking in detail and writer’s general understanding of the theory is lacking. Aspects of theory later used in application to the character are excluded. One or no sources outside of the textbook are cited.
/ 12 pts
Personality Analysis
view longer description
15 to >14 pts
Full Marks
Application of theory takes character’s background into account and effectively provides explantion for character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors according to the selected theory. Writer’s understanding is apparent through accurate connections of theory to aspects of the character’s personality, as well as interpretations they provide.
14 to >12 pts
Well done
Application of theory takes character’s background into account and effectively provides explantion for character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors according to the selected theory. Some opportunites to make connections were missed, but the writer’s understanding is apparent through those they do make, as well as interpretations they provide.
12 to >10 pts
Acceptable
Application of theory takes character’s background into account and effectively provides explantion for character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors according to the selected theory. Some opportunites to make connections were missed, but the writer’s understanding is apparent through those they do make. Writer might fail to include their own interpretations or fails clearly present the interpretations they do make.
10 to >8 pts
Needs work
Application of theory takes some of character’s background into account and may provide some explantion for character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors according to the selected theory; however, many opportunites to make connections are missed, leaving some question regarding the writer’s understanding. Writer fails to include their own interpretations or fails to clearly present the interpretations they do make.
8 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Application of theory does not adequately take character’s background into account, nor provide thorough explantion for character’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors according to the selected theory. Many opportunites to make connections are missed, and writer’s understanding is unclear. Writer fails to include their own interpretations or fails to clearly present the interpretations they do make.
/ 15 pts
Adherence to assignment and APA guidelines
view longer description
5 to >4 pts
Full Marks
Paper is at least 5 pages, double spaced, excluding the title and reference pages. APA formatting is used appropriately, including proper organization, citations, and reference page.
4 to >3 pts
Well done
Paper is at least 5 pages, double spaced, excluding the title and reference pages. APA formatting is used mostly appropriately, with a few noticeable errors.
3 to >2 pts
Acceptable
Paper is at least 5 pages, double spaced, excluding the title and reference pages. APA formatting is used mostly appropriately, with several noticeable errors.
2 to >1 pts
Needs work
Paper is at least 4 pages, double spaced, excluding the title and reference pages. APA formatting is used appropriately OR has a few noticeable errors.
1 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Paper is at least 4 pages, double spaced, excluding the title and reference pages, with several noteable errors, OR paper is less than 4 pages.
/ 5 pts
Writing style (including professionalism, flow, voice, etc.)
view longer description
5 to >4 pts
Full Marks
Paper is coherently organized and the logic is easy to follow. There are no spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is clear.
4 to >3 pts
Well done
Paper is generally well organized and easy to follow. There may be a few minor spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is clear.
3 to >2 pts
Acceptable
Paper is generally well organized and mostly easy to follow. There are several spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is mostly clear.
2 to >1 pts
Needs work
Paper is poorly organized, difficult to read, and/or does not flow logically. There are several spelling and grammatical errors. Writing lacks clarity.
1 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Paper is poorly organized, difficult to read, and/or does not flow logically. There are enough spelling and grammatical errors that they distract from the content of the paper. Writing lacks clarity.