What might you want to understand better before reading the original Stoet and Geary article and/or Richardson’s formal protest to it and/or Stoet and Geary’s corrections?

Then submit 1-1.5 double spaced pages total for both of the following questions:
What might you want to understand better before reading the original Stoet and Geary article and/or Richardson’s formal protest to it and/or Stoet and Geary’s corrections?
In either article you just read, are there claims you feel might be overreaching or informed by bias? Which claims, and why